Day 71
Jan drinks “Two-buck Chuck,”
the shitty-but-drinkable red wine from Trader Joe’s. Exclusively. He buys it by
the case, and spends 60% of his waking hours sitting at the kitchen table,
pouring wine into a tiny wine goblet and drinking glass after glass. I offered
to buy Jan a bottle of Scotch. Rose forbids it.
Jan is only allowed to drink wine – no hard liquor – and must use the
tiny wineglass to drink it. Both are unsuccessful attempts to curb Jan’s
drinking.
For someone who drinks
multiple bottles of wine each day (and lives in the middle of California wine
country), Jan is completely ignorant about all things vino.
Noah: Jan, what is it about
Two-buck Chuck that appeals to you? The bouquet? The palette? The antioxidants?
Jan: (long pause) I just
like the way it tastes.
Noah: And how does it
taste?
Jan: (cheerfully drunk)
Like wine!
Day 72
I believe Jan is threatened
by my scientific credentials. Here’s a
guy who never went to college , moved out to California just in time for the
computer boom. He works for a while in a series of technology-related jobs. Now
he’s basically living in the past. Jan
frequently feels the need to ask me oddly-timed technical questions about my
job. Most of these questions seem aimed at tripping me up and making him sound
smarter to his family in the process.
Usually, however, his efforts only serve to expose his ignorance. Witness this dinnertime conversation:
Jan: Hey Noah, why does the
hydrogen cyanide in peach pits make my skin look younger. [Editor’s note: 80% of Jan’s face is covered
with a long, Unabomber-style
beard].
Noah: Seriously?
Jan: Yes.
Noah: Well, there is
hydrogen cyanide in peach pits, but only a tiny amount. High quantities in-
Jan: (grinning maniacally, as though he’s trapped me in a lie) But I rub
peach pit cream on my face to make it look younger. Why is that?
Rose: Jan, aren’t you
talking about apricot scrub?
Jan: (losing confidence
quickly) Uh, no.
Noah: You rub peach pits on
your face to appear younger?
Jan: (obviously lying) Yes.
Jan: (obviously lying) Yes.
Day 74
Three weeks after starting,
I am called into the boss’ office and was told that I’m not making the kind of
progress he’d hoped for when he hired me.
I’ll let that statement
sink in. Anyone who’s worked in a lab is probably already chuckling. Three
weeks in science is an eyeblink; it’s like calling an office worker in 15
minutes after he’s been hired and complaining he hasn’t hit his yearly sales
goals. Put another way, thousands of scientists have spent billions of dollars
and countless man hours trying to cure Alzheimer’s disease. None of them
managed to do it in three weeks, or in over 100 years, for that matter.
Accordingly, none of these scientists were given grief for failing to find a
cure in their first three weeks.
Making a gentle version of
this point, I requested clarification. Mcboss refused to talk specifics, and
repeated the corporate idioms that we needed to meet our corporate milestones
and advance our mission statement. My
co-workers assured me this was something he did every few months. The prevailing sentiment was that it was
therapeutic for him. Susan mentions that
this was the first day I mentioned looking for a new job.
Other problems are evident.
When I’d interviewed, I noticed the staff was missing. All of them were at a
farewell lunch for a departing scientist. One of several, it turns out. I
learned – courtesy of the oversharer – that literally the entire scientific
staff was turned over shortly before I arrived. One guy quit, one was fired. In
any event, it sounded ugly.
Next Time: A naked Susan
meets Jan, and a run-in with negligent homosexuals.
No comments:
Post a Comment